|
 |
Tip
Sheet: Business, Law & Economics

Tip sheets highlight timely news and events at Washington University in St. Louis. For more information on any of the stories below or for assistance in arranging interviews, please see the contact information listed with each story. For comments on the Business, Law & Economics news tips service, please contact the editor, Robert Batterson at (314) 935-5202 or
batterson@olin.wustl.edu.
Tips Sheets: Business,
Law & Econ | Culture
& Living | Medical
Science & Health | Science & Technology
SEC disclosure
regulations may be overwhelming investors with too much information

Media assistance:
Jessica Roberts
- (314) 935-5251
Source: Troy
Paredes - (314) 935-8216

[St.
Louis, Mo., March 2003] - Investors
and legislators alike continue
to be concerned about the true
state of companies. Since the
corporate accounting scandals
of Enron, Tyco, WorldCom and others,
there has been a legislative push
for full disclosure from companies.
 |
|
Troy Paredes |
As
corporations now follow the SEC's
strict mandatory disclosure guidelines,
the question arises, how much
is too much? Troy Paredes, associate
professor of law at the Washington
University School of Law, says
the SEC and companies need to
reexamine the mandatory disclosure
regulations because investors
may be provided too much information,
making current disclosure regulation
counterproductive.
Analysts and investors are inundated
with hundreds of pages of documents
about individual companies that
are intended to assist in investment
decision-making. Yet Paredes finds
that this "information overload"
plays against human nature.
"Investing is not easy. At bottom,
investing is about evaluating
companies and deciding what their
securities are worth. Despite
all the references in the media,
judicial opinions, and scholarly
work to a company's 'fundamental
value' or 'intrinsic value,' no
such figure actually exists. Relatively
little attention is paid to how
investors process information
and make decisions based on the
information federal securities
laws make available. If investors
do not process information effectively,
it is not clear what good mandating
disclosure does."
Paredes notes that due to this
information overload, investors
may choose investments based on
ease rather than the information
provided. Recognizing the continuing
need for mandatory disclosure
from companies, he calls for disclosure
documents that are more accessible
to investors.
"First, there needs to be more
empirical data on information
overload and its effect on investors.
Second, there needs to be a better
presentation and formatting of
information that facilitates comparison
without losing substance. Finally,
disclosure requirements need to
take into account the psychology
of investors."
Paredes' full article on this
subject will be in an upcoming
issue of the Washington University
Law Quarterly. This issue will
contain a selection of articles
from the recent F. Hodge O'Neal
Corporate and Securities Law Symposium.
|
|