| Kathleen Clark |
Media Assistance:
 Jessica Martin Director, News & Information for the School of Law and the George Warren Brown School of Social Work jessica_martin@wustl.edu (314) 935-5251 |
 |
| Clark |
|
|
| Clips: |
|
Showing Clips 1 through 3 of 13. - Show More |
 Show More Clips |
|
| Clemens Autograph Seekers May Have Broken Federal Law
The New York Times Feb. 14, 2008 -- WUSTL 's Kathleen Clark, law professor, comments on members of the House oversight committee who asked Roger Clemens for an autograph during his tour of the Capitol. The requests may have violated a federal law against soliciting things of value from people with interests before the committee, |
| Allen didn't disclose stock options from corporate board
Associated Press and 77 others Oct. 9, 2006 -- Congressional rules require senators to disclose to the Senate all deferred compensation, such as stock options. The rules also urge senators to avoid taking any official action that could benefit them financially or appear to do so. Sen. George Allen still holds stock options from his time as director of a high-tech company, but has failed to disclose them to the Congress and the public the past five years. He also asked the Army to help another business that gave him similar options. WUSTL legal ethics expert and law professor Kathleen Clark comments. |
| Ethics with a punch: Senate leader took free boxing tickets
Associated Press May 30, 2006 -- Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, who has criticized Republican ethics, accepted free ringside tickets to three professional boxing matches from Nevada officials who were trying to influence his federal legislation regulating the sport. Kathleen Clark, a WUSTL congressional ethics expert, said Congress should re-examine the exemption allowing gifts by state and federal and local governments because they too can have interest in influencing federal lawmakers like Reid. |
Articles
* "The Legacy of Watergate for Legal Ethics Instruction"
51 Hastings Law Journal 673 (2000)
* "The Lawful and the Just: Moral Implications of Unequal Access to Legal Services," forthcoming in 2 J. Inst. Stud. Leg. Eth. (1999)
* "The Ethics of Representing Elected Representatives," 61 Law and Contemporary Problems 31 (Spring 1998)
* "Paying the Price for Heightened Ethics Scrutiny: Legal Defense Funds for Government Officials," 50 Stanford Law Review 65 (1997)
* "Toward More Ethical Government: An Inspector General for the White House," 49 Mercer Law Review 553 (1997) (part of a symposium on the Independent Counsel statute)
* "Do We Have Enough Ethics in Government Yet? An Answer from Fiduciary Theory," 1996 University of Illinois Law Review 57
* "Is Discipline Different? An Essay on Choice of Law and Lawyer Conduct," 36 South Texas Law Review 1069 (1995) (part of a symposium issue on Ethics and the Multi-Jurisdictional Practice of Law)
Chapters in Books
* "Regulating the Conflict of Interest of Government Officials"
(in Conflict of Interest in the Professions (Michael Davis &
Andrew Stark, eds.) (Oxford University Press 2001)
* "Be Careful What You Accept From Whom: Restrictions on Gifts and Compensation for Executive Branch Employees" in The Lobbying Manual 242-51 (William V. Luneberg, ed. (1998)
|
Related Information Related Links:
Related Groups:
|