Record current issueDebate 08

Gargoyle

  -  Faculty Experts


  -  News by Topic

  -  News by School


Search News & Info


WUSTL in the News
  - Powered by Google


WUSTL Home

Public Affairs Home

News
Releases

University News

Medical News

Sports News

Radio Service

Tip Sheets

Business, Law & Econ

Culture & Living

Science & Technology
Media Resources
Contact Information

TV/Radio Studio

Visiting Our Campuses

Campus Images

Sports photography
Commercial Filming
   and Photography


Commercial Use of
   Names and Symbols

Domain Name policy
WUSTL Information
Record (newspaper)

Campus Calendars

WUSTL News Summary

Publications Online

Facts, Guides & Maps


Washington University in St. Louis News & Information > WUSTL in the News >


WUSTL in the News Spotlight


(Excerpted from Associated Press Online, Tuesday, Sept. 28, 2004)

Court takes on question of seizing land

The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to decide when local governments may seize people's homes and businesses against their will to make way for projects like shopping malls and hotel complexes that produce more tax revenue.

The court already has given governments broad power to take private property through eminent domain, provided the owner is given "just compensation." This often involves blighted neighborhoods residents are eager to leave.

Daniel Mandelker, a law professor specializing in land use at Washington University School of Law, said towns have legitimate reasons to take property, but the high court should redefine their limits.

But in recent years more cities and towns have been accused of abusing their authority, razing nice homes to make way for parking lots for casinos and other tax-producing businesses.

"If you own a home, if you own a small business, this could directly affect you," said Scott Bullock, senior attorney for the Institute for Justice, a Washington public interest law firm representing the land owners.

In agreeing to hear a Connecticut case early next year, justices will revisit an issue they last dealt with 20 years ago. The court unanimously ruled then that Hawaii could take land from large property owners and resell it to others, and determined that decisions about takings were best left to elected leaders.




Appeared in:

Click headline below to view news story as originally posted on an external Web site.

•   Court takes on question of seizing land

Associated Press Online, Tuesday, Sept. 28, 2004
Byline: Gina Holland

•   US High Court To Rule When Cities Can Seize Private Land

Wall Street Journal, Tuesday, Sept. 28, 2004
Byline: Dow Jones Newswires


Story also ran in 20 others:  Guardian UK, Concord Monitor NH, Oakland Tribune CA, Barre Montpelier Times Argus VT, Times Picayune LA, Tallahassee Democrat FL, Macon Telegraph GA, Centre Daily Times PA, Fort Wayne News Sentinel IN, Fort Worth Star Telegram TX, Philadelphia Inquirer PA, Grand Forks Herald ND, Kansas City Star KS, Myrtle Beach Sun News SC, Miami Herald FL, Duluth News Tribune MN, Detroit Free Press MI, San Diego Union Tribune CA, Colorado Springs Gazette CO and others
(Note: Links do not imply an endorsement; some sites require registration; links may change or become broken over time.)


Related Information
Media Assistance:

Jessica Martin
Director, News & Information for the School of Law and the George Warren Brown School of Social Work
jessica_martin@wustl.edu

(314) 935-5251
Subject Matter Experts:

Related Groups:

Schools:
School of Law

- View All Groups

Related Topics:
Constitutional Law
Law & Legal Issues
Supreme Court

- View All Topics

Revised:

Thursday, Dec. 30, 2004


  Email this page

  Print ready page


News & Information  |   Medical News  |   Office of Public Affairs  |   WUSTL Home

Please contact us and let us know how we can assist you.
Technical problems with this Web site? Email questions or comments.
Please review the WUSTL News & Information copyright/privacy policy.