Record current issueAssembly Series

Gargoyle

  -  Faculty Experts


  -  News by Topic

  -  News by School


Search News & Info


WUSTL in the News
  - Powered by Google


WUSTL Home

Public Affairs Home

News
Releases

University News

Medical News

Sports News

Radio Service

Tip Sheets

Business, Law & Econ

Culture & Living

Science & Technology
Media Resources
Contact Information

TV/Radio Studio

Visiting Our Campuses

Campus Images

Sports photography
Commercial Filming
   and Photography


Commercial Use of
   Names and Symbols

Domain Name policy
WUSTL Information
Record (newspaper)

Campus Calendars

WUSTL News Summary

Publications Online

Facts, Guides & Maps


WUSTL in the News >


WUSTL in the News Spotlight


(Excerpted from The Washington Post, Thursday, March 13, 2008)

New Study Raises Questions on Anesthesia Monitoring System

Experts Say Further Study Needed to Understand Why Anesthesia Fails

Imagine this: You're lying on the operating table, apparently unconscious. The surgeon is cutting. But you're still awake. Not only that, you're paralyzed by the drugs the anesthesiologist gave you and can't speak out.

That horrifying experience happens to between 20,000 and 40,000 Americans every year, leaving many -- not surprisingly -- severely traumatized.

Now, a study in today's issue of the New England Journal of Medicine is raising questions about a monitor used by about 60 percent of U.S. operating rooms in an effort to prevent these frightening cases.

The study involved 1,941 patients who underwent operations at the Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis. Anesthesiologists monitored half the patients with a system called BIS (bispectral index system) that analyzes brain waves so doctors can supposedly tell if a patient isn't totally unconscious or is starting to wake up. For the other half of the patients in the study, doctors simply paid especially close attention to the dosages of anesthesia.

An equal number in each group -- two -- turned out to have been awake for at least part of their operations. One 51-year-old patient being monitored by BIS came to during pancreatic surgery and felt "white-hot fire pain" in his abdomen and his "organs and intestines moving around," the researchers wrote. He remembers "crying and thinking, 'If someone can see my crying, then someone can help me.' "

Five other patients who were monitored by BIS might have experienced some awareness as well, compared with just one in the other group, the researchers reported.

Michael S. Avidan of the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, who led the study, said his findings raise questions about whether the pricey brain monitors are worthwhile. ...




Appeared in:

Click headline below to view news story as originally posted on an external Web site.

•   New Study Raises Questions on Anesthesia Monitoring System

Experts Say Further Study Needed to Understand Why Anesthesia Fails

The Washington Post, Thursday, March 13, 2008
Byline: Rob Stein, Washington Post Staff Writer


Story also ran in 1 others:  The Ledger (FL)
(Note: Links do not imply an endorsement; some sites require registration; links may change or become broken over time.)


Related Information
Media Assistance:

Joni Westerhouse
Executive Director for Medical Communications
westerhousej@wustl.edu

(314) 286-0120
Related Groups:

Schools:
School of Medicine

Departments:
Anesthesiology

- View All Groups

Related Topics:
Medical / Pharmaceutical Research Issues
Medical Ethics
Medical Science
Science & Technology
Surgery

- View All Topics

Revised:

Tuesday, March 25, 2008


  Email this page

  Print ready page


News & Information  |   Medical News  |   Office of Public Affairs  |   WUSTL Home

Please contact us and let us know how we can assist you.
Technical problems with this Web site? Email questions or comments.
Please review the WUSTL News & Information copyright/privacy policy.